News & Tech Tips

Beware of the gray areas in accounting

Accounting and auditing standards have come under scrutiny in the wake of recent high-profile bank failures. Investigations are currently underway about what went wrong with Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank. But it’s likely that some “gray areas” in the accounting rules were exploited to make these organizations appear more economically secure in their year-end financial statements than they truly were.

Lessons from Enron

Andrew Fastow often speaks publicly about the issue of financial misstatement. As a convicted felon, Fastow has a unique perspective on fraud: He was the CFO of Enron in October 2001 — when it became the largest U.S. bankruptcy of its time. In March 2023, Fastow presented to the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB), which was created by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 to prevent another Enron-like scandal. He advised the PCAOB to consider amending the accounting and auditing rules to help prevent corporate fraud.

Instead of focusing on finding the intentional fraudulent entry, Fastow said the PCAOB should concentrate on “fraud that occurs by exploiting loopholes for the ambiguity and complexity in the rules.” The latter is more the Enron story than recording the wrong number purposely, according to Fastow.

Compliance vs. reality

To elaborate, he gave a simple example of how financial statements, while perfectly in compliance with the rules, could be divorced from economic reality: In 2014, the average price of oil was $95 per barrel. For most of the year, the price was $110, but it dropped to $50 at year-end. Under the accounting rules at that time, companies were supposed to take the price of oil on the first day of each of the 12 preceding months and average it. The result of this calculation was $95, but the market price was $50 when oil and gas companies released their financial statements.

Fastow said that every oil and gas company followed the rule and used $95 per barrel to report their reserves — even though the market price was $50 at year-end. “All of them massively overstated their economically recoverable reserves, which is perhaps the most important metric that Wall Street looks at when they evaluate independent oil and gas companies. The mindset among people is so long as you’re following the rules, it doesn’t matter if the financial statements are misleading,” concluded Fastow.

Complex problem

Charles Niemeier, the former founding member of the PCAOB, said solving the issue of financial reporting fraud is bigger than just revamping the auditing standards. And the challenge is greater for financial reporting matters that rely on subjective judgment calls.

For instance, accounting estimates may be based on subjective or objective information (or both) and involve some level of measurement uncertainty. Examples of accounting estimates include allowances for doubtful accounts, impairments of long-lived assets, and valuations of financial and nonfinancial assets. Some estimates may be easily determinable, but many are inherently subjective or complex.

Another matter that may be susceptible to manipulation is the going concern assessment, which underlies all financial reporting under U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. The accounting rules give a company’s management the final responsibility to decide whether there’s substantial doubt about the company’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures. The standard provides guidance to management, with principles and definitions that are intended to reduce diversity in the timing and content of disclosures that companies commonly provide in their footnotes.

We can help

Financial misstatement can happen when managers use the gray areas in financial reporting to their advantage, especially as the rules have moved from historic cost in favor of fair value estimates. When making subjective estimates and evaluating the going concern assumption, it’s important to step back and ask whether your company’s financial statements, while in compliance with the rules, could potentially mislead investors. Contact us to address questions you may have about these complex matters. We can help you understand the rules and assess current market conditions.

© 2023

Tailored Consulting Service Announcement

We are excited to announce that Whalen CPAs is expanding its services and is now offering Dental & Healthcare Practice Consulting. We believe this new addition will help us provide our clients with comprehensive solutions that will improve their practice’s overall health and maximize profits.

 

We understand that managing a dental or healthcare practice can be complex and time-consuming. With our new consulting service, we aim to simplify the process and provide our clients with the tools and resources they need to make informed decisions. Our team of experts, led by Laurie Morgan, a dentist and instructional designer, has firsthand experience dealing with the intricacies of practice management.

 

We prioritize collaboration and transparency, and our team will work closely with you to understand your unique needs and goals. We offer a range of services, including data analysis, market research, and strategic planning, to help you make informed decisions and achieve your internal goals.

 

At Whalen CPAs, we’re committed to providing our clients with the highest quality of service. We believe this new offering will help us better serve your needs and provide you with a more efficient and streamlined practice. We’re excited about this new service and look forward to working with you.

 

If you have any questions or want to learn more about our new consulting services, please don’t hesitate to contact us. We’re always here to help.

There’s a favorable “stepped-up basis” if you inherit property

A common question for people planning their estates or inheriting property is: For tax purposes, what’s the “cost” (or “basis”) an individual gets in property that he or she inherits from another? This is an important area and is too often overlooked when families start to put their affairs in order.

Under the fair market value basis rules (also known as the “step-up and step-down” rules), an heir receives a basis in inherited property that’s equal to its date-of-death value. So, for example, if your grandfather bought shares in an oil stock in 1940 for $500 and it was worth $5 million at his death, the basis would be stepped up to $5 million for your grandfather’s heirs. That means all of that gain escapes income taxation forever!

The fair market value basis rules apply to inherited property that’s includible in the deceased individual’s gross estate, whether or not a federal estate tax return was filed, and those rules also apply to property inherited from foreign persons, who aren’t subject to U.S. estate tax. The rules apply to the inherited portion of property owned by the inheriting taxpayer jointly with the deceased, but not the portion of the jointly-held property that the inheriting taxpayer owned before his or her inheritance. The fair market value basis rules also don’t apply to reinvestments of estate assets by fiduciaries.

Lifetime gifting

It’s crucial for you to understand the fair market value basis rules so that you don’t pay more tax than you’re legally required to.

For example, in the above scenario, if your grandfather instead decided to make a gift of the stock during his lifetime (rather than passing it on when he died), the “step-up” in basis (from $500 to $5 million) would be lost. Property acquired by gift that has gone up in value is subject to the “carryover” basis rules. That means the person receiving the gift takes the same basis the donor had in it ($500 in this example), plus a portion of any gift tax the donor pays on the gift.

A “step-down” occurs if someone dies owning property that has declined in value. In that case, the basis is lowered to the date-of-death value. Proper planning calls for seeking to avoid this loss of basis. Giving the property away before death won’t preserve the basis. That’s because when property that has gone down in value is the subject of a gift, the person receiving the gift must take the date of gift value as his or her basis (for purposes of determining his or her loss on a later sale). Therefore, a good strategy for property that has declined in value is for the owner to sell it before death so he or she can enjoy the tax benefits of the loss.

These are the basic rules. Other rules and limits may apply. For example, in some cases, a deceased person’s executor may be able to make an alternate valuation election. And gifts made just before a person dies (sometimes called “death bed gifts”) may be included in the gross estate for tax purposes. Contact us for tax assistance when estate planning or after receiving an inheritance.

© 2023

Paperwork you can toss after filing your tax return

Once you file your 2022 tax return, you may wonder what personal tax papers you can throw away and how long you should retain certain records. You may have to produce those records if the IRS audits your return or seeks to assess tax.

It’s a good idea to keep the actual returns indefinitely. But what about supporting records such as receipts and canceled checks? In general, except in cases of fraud or substantial understatement of income, the IRS can only assess tax within three years after the return for that year was filed (or three years after the return was due). For example, if you filed your 2019 tax return by its original due date of April 15, 2020, the IRS has until April 15, 2023, to assess a tax deficiency against you. If you file late, the IRS generally has three years from the date you filed.

However, the assessment period is extended to six years if more than 25% of gross income is omitted from a return. In addition, if no return is filed, the IRS can assess tax any time. If the IRS claims you never filed a return for a particular year, a copy of the return will help prove you did.

Property-related records

The tax consequences of a transaction that occurs this year may depend on events that happened years ago. For example, suppose you bought your home in 2007, made capital improvements in 2014 and sold it this year. To determine the tax consequences of the sale, you must know your basis in the home — your original cost, plus later capital improvements. If you’re audited, you may have to produce records related to the purchase in 2007 and the capital improvements in 2014 to prove what your basis is. Therefore, those records should be kept until at least six years after filing your return for the year of sale.

Retain all records related to home purchases and improvements even if you expect your gain to be covered by the home-sale exclusion, which can be up to $500,000 for joint return filers. You’ll still need to prove the amount of your basis if the IRS inquires. Plus, there’s no telling what the home will be worth when it’s sold, and there’s no guarantee the home-sale exclusion will still be available in the future.

Other considerations apply to property that’s likely to be bought and sold — for example, stock or shares in a mutual fund. Remember that if you reinvest dividends to buy additional shares, each reinvestment is a separate purchase.

Marital breakup

If you separate or divorce, be sure you have access to tax records affecting you that are kept by your spouse. Or better yet, make copies of the records since access to them may be difficult. Copies of all joint returns filed and supporting records are important, since both spouses are liable for tax on a joint return and a deficiency may be asserted against either spouse. Other important records include agreements or decrees over custody of children and any agreement about who is entitled to claim them as dependents.

Loss or destruction of records

To safeguard records against theft, fire, or other disaster, consider keeping important papers in a safe deposit box or other safe place outside your home. In addition, consider keeping copies in a single, easily accessible location so that you can grab them if you must leave your home in an emergency.

Contact us if you have any questions about record retention.

© 2023

New-and-improved accounting rules for common control leases

On March 27, 2023, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) published narrowly drawn amendments to the lease accounting rules. The updated guidance clarifies issues that are relevant to rental agreements between businesses that have the same owner.

Written vs. verbal leases

Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2023-01, Leases (Topic 842) Common Control Arrangements, explains how related business entities that are controlled by the same owner determine whether a lease exists. Specifically, it provides an optional practical expedient to private companies and not-for-profit organizations that aren’t conduit bond obligors. (A practical expedient is an accounting workaround that allows a company to use a simpler route to get to the same outcome.) The guidance settles questions about how to approach verbal common control leases and whether legal counsel is required to determine the terms and conditions of a lease.
The practical expedient is applicable only for written leases. Under the updated guidance, a private company electing the practical expedient must use the written terms and conditions of a common control arrangement to determine whether a lease exists and, if so, how to account for it. In the case of a lease agreement that’s verbal — as is often the case between private entities under common control — the company must document the existing unwritten terms before applying the lease accounting rules.

The lessee isn’t required to determine whether written terms and conditions are enforceable when applying the practical expedient. In addition, companies are allowed to apply the practical expedient on an arrangement-by-arrangement basis.

Leasehold improvements

The accounting rules related to certain leasehold improvements have also changed for both public and private organizations under ASU 2023-01. Examples of leasehold improvements include installing carpet, painting and building out the space for the lessee’s needs. For example, a salon might install sinks and plumbing fixtures, a chemical manufacturer might need ventilation for its production process and an eco-friendly restaurant might design a rooftop garden to attract patrons.
The amendments require lessees to amortize leasehold improvements over the improvements’ useful lives to the common control group — regardless of the lease term. When the lessee no longer controls that underlying asset, the transfer of those improvements must be accounted for through equity or net asset. The improvements remain subject to the impairment requirements of Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 360, Property, Plant and Equipment.

Implementation guidance

ASU No. 2023-01 is an amendment to ASC Topic 842, Leases, which was issued in 2016. This standard requires the full effect of entities’ long-term lease obligations to be reported on the balance sheet. It went into effect for public entities in 2019 and for private entities in 2022.

The new-and-improved rules will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for both interim and annual financial statements that haven’t yet been made available for issuance. If a company adopts the amendments in an interim period, the company must adopt them as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes that interim period.

If your company decides to adopt ASU 2023-01 concurrently with the adoption of Topic 842, you should use the same transition approach as that standard. If your company adopts the rules in a subsequent period, you can do so either retrospectively or prospectively.

For more information

Does your company rent property from a related party? We can help you report these arrangements in accordance with the updated guidance. Our accounting pros understand how to determine whether a common control lease exists and how to report leasehold improvements and other fixes that have been made to rented property. Contact Us!

© 2023